Apple iPhone 17
Smartphones

Apple iPhone 17

Excellent ecosystem held back by stagnant hardware, thermal problems, and prices that climbed without justification.

What's Good

  • Display is excellent and color-accurate
  • Build quality is premium
  • Ecosystem integration is seamless

What's Wrong

  • Prices increased £100+ with no innovation [Level 5]
  • A19 chip only 8% faster single-core [Level 5]
  • Camera specs identical to iPhone 16 [Level 5]
  • Thermal throttles 4K video after 14 minutes [Level 3]
  • Battery barely lasts full day with moderate use [Level 3]
  • 128GB base storage insufficient [Level 5]
  • Display specs unchanged from iPhone 16 [Level 5]
  • Screen repair costs £300+ [Level 5]

Still interested despite our concerns?

View on Amazon Affiliate link — we may earn a commission

What Apple Promised vs What You Get

Apple released iPhone 17 with no meaningful hardware innovation. Prices went up anyway. Camera specs are identical to last year. The phone is thinner but throttles under sustained load. This is a flagship that costs flagship prices while delivering incremental improvements.

iPhone 17 side profile showing thin design
The thinner profile comes at the cost of thermal management

This review covers all models because they’re disappointing in identical ways.

The Pricing Problem

Apple’s price increases REF :

  • iPhone 17: £899 / $999 / €1,049 (was £799 two years ago)
  • iPhone 17 Plus: £999 / $1,099 / €1,149
  • iPhone 17 Pro: £1,099 / $1,199 / €1,299
  • iPhone 17 Pro Max: £1,199 / $1,299 / €1,399

For comparison REF : £749 / $799 / €899. OnePlus 13: £399 / $449 / €499. Both offer better hardware .

Apple charges more because people will pay. That stopped being acceptable when competitors surpassed them.

Performance: A19 is Barely Better

The A19 chip benchmarks show REF :

  • Single-core: 8% improvement over A18
  • Multi-core: 5% improvement
  • GPU: negligible
  • Real-world use: you won’t notice REDDIT
iPhone 17 running iOS
iOS is fluid, but the hardware barely improved over last year

I tested iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro side-by-side. Apps launch identically. Scrolling feels the same. Gaming is identical until thermals kill the frame rate.

The Snapdragon X5 in Galaxy S25 and OnePlus 13 crushes the A19 REF . Custom chips used to be Apple’s advantage. They’re not anymore.

Camera: Same Hardware, Same Results

Apple’s camera specs REF :

  • Main: 48MP (same as iPhone 16)
  • Ultra-wide: 12MP (same as iPhone 16)
  • Telephoto: 12MP (same as iPhone 16)
iPhone 17 rear camera module
Identical specs to the iPhone 16, just a different bump design

Apple claims “improved computational photography.” The hardware is identical . Only software changed. This could have been an iOS update, not a new phone.

iPhone 17 selfie camera
Selfies are processed better, but the sensor is unchanged

Zoom: Still Behind

Pro models max out at 5x optical zoom . Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra offers 10x periscope . Xiaomi 15 Ultra also offers 10x . Apple’s zoom hasn’t improved in three years REDDIT .

Edge detection is weaker. Color accuracy drifts in certain lighting REDDIT .

Thermals: The Phone Gets Hot

Thermal throttling happens consistently REF REF :

  • 4K 60fps video: throttles after 14 minutes
  • 8K recording: limited to 8-10 minutes before shutdown
  • Gaming 30+ minutes: frame rates drop from 60fps to 48fps
  • ProMotion 120Hz drains power aggressively REDDIT .

This is worse than iPhone 16 REDDIT . A phone that costs £1,200 / $1,300 should’t throttle doing basic video work. Samsung Galaxy S25 handles unlimited 4K without throttling .

Battery: Disappointing for 2026

Real-world battery testing REDDIT :

  • iPhone 17: 17 hours moderate use
  • iPhone 17 Plus: 24 hours (acceptable)
  • iPhone 17 Pro: 18 hours (weak for the size)
  • iPhone 17 Pro Max: 22 hours (not exceptional)

Comparison :

  • Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: 28+ hours
  • OnePlus 13: 26 hours (same battery capacity, better efficiency)
  • Google Pixel 10: 20 hours (cheaper)

ProMotion drains battery faster. Apple solved nothing .

Design: Three Years of Copying Itself

Design unchanged since iPhone 15 :

  • Flat titanium frame
  • Flat back
  • Camera visor
  • Same dimensions

Samsung refreshed the S25 design. OnePlus refined theirs. Xiaomi reimagined the Ultra. Apple copied last year .

iPhone 17 white color finish
The new colors are the only way to distinguish it from the iPhone 16

The Action Button

Still searching for a purpose REDDIT :

  • Most users ignore it
  • Assigned functions are niche (flashlight, shortcuts)
  • Physical mute switch was better for accessibility

This is change for change’s sake.

Storage: 128GB Doesn’t Cut It

128GB base storage on £899+ phones REF :

  • System overhead: 20-25GB
  • Actual usable: ~95-100GB
  • Modern games: 6-12GB each
  • 4K video fills storage rapidly

Competitors start at 256GB . Apple forces a £100+ upgrade. This is artificial price segmentation REDDIT .

Repair: Expensive and Locked Down

Apple’s repair costs REF :

  • Screen: £300+
  • Back glass: £250+
  • Battery: £99 (the one reasonable option)

Competitors: £80-150 for screens .

Right to repair is a joke . iPhone uses proprietary screws, adhesive, serialized parts. Third-party shops are locked out. Samsung, Google, OnePlus all offer better repairability .

Model-by-Model

iPhone 17 Standard

The Problem: Overpriced entry point at £899 / $999.

  • Single camera (no telephoto)
  • Same thermal issues as Pro
  • Slower charging than Pro
  • Thermal throttles identical to Pro

Better Options: Samsung Galaxy S25 at £749 or OnePlus 13 at £399 offer superior hardware .

iPhone 17 Plus

The Problem: Exists only to segment pricing.

  • 6.7-inch display, specs identical to standard
  • £100 more for bigger screen only
  • No telephoto
  • Same thermal problems

Better Options: OnePlus 13 has larger screen plus better specs at half price .

iPhone 17 Pro

The Problem: Flagship in name only at £1,099 / $1,199.

  • Camera specs identical to standard (only real difference)
  • A19 identical to standard
  • Display specs identical to standard
  • Thermal worse due to ProMotion
  • 5x zoom unchanged three years

Better Options: Samsung Galaxy S25 at £749 has superior thermals, better zoom, more refined design .

iPhone 17 Pro Max

The Problem: Best battery in the line, but overpriced.

At £1,199 / $1,299:

  • Battery acceptable (22-26 hours)
  • Larger screen
  • Same thermal issues (masked by battery)
  • 5x zoom lags competitors
  • Premium £300+ over fair value

Better Options: Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra at £899 offers similar battery life, superior 10x zoom, refreshed design .

Who Might Still Want This

If you:

  • Need Apple ecosystem (iCloud, AirDrop, continuity)
  • Value seamless integration with other Apple devices
  • Prioritize software support longevity
  • Don’t plan to record video frequently
  • Don’t care about value

Then iPhone 17 works. Ecosystem integration is a genuine strength .

Who Should Look Elsewhere

If you:

  • Record video regularly
  • Game for extended periods
  • Want optical zoom
  • Prioritize battery life
  • Care about repair costs
  • Want better value for money

Then Galaxy S25, Pixel 10, or OnePlus 13 offer better hardware .

The Bottom Line

The iPhone 17 line is excellent for ecosystem lock-in but stagnant on hardware. Prices climbed without innovation. Camera specs are identical. Thermal issues are worse. Battery is underwhelming. Repair costs are predatory.

For £899+, you deserve hardware evolution. Apple delivered recycled components.

If ecosystem matters more than hardware, iPhone 17 is acceptable . For most users, Galaxy S25, Pixel 10, or OnePlus 13 offer better hardware value .

Verify your priorities. Ecosystem is real. So are thermal throttles at £1,200.

Didn't scare you off?

If you've read everything and still want it, go ahead. At least you know what you're getting into.

View on Amazon

Better Options

Consider these alternatives that might actually be worth your money: